Debating Partition: Justifications and Critiques

نویسندگان

  • Brendan O’Leary
  • John McGarry
چکیده

DEBATING PARTITION: JUSTIFICATIONS AND CRITIQUES Political partitions—fresh political borders cut through at least one community's homeland—have been regularly commended to resolve national, ethnic and communal conflicts. The strongest five political arguments in their favor are presented in this article. The neglected question of how partitions may be implemented is also considered. Then the seven most powerful political arguments of anti-partitionists are treated. Partition should only be considered when there is a high degree of confidence that genocide or mass expulsions will occur, and its proponents should consider that preparing for partition may precipitate the awful outcomes it is nominally intended to prevent.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Model Based Critique of Justifications for Action

Justifications for actions can typically be critiqued on a number of grounds. Critiques of such justifications can be structured using an argumentation scheme for practical reasoning and associated critical questions. The form that the critiques can take in a computational system, however, depends crucially on the semantic underpinnings of the scheme. We describe a semantic model which, we argu...

متن کامل

Variational Principle

Variational principle for probabilistic learning Yet another justification More simplification of updates for mean-field family Examples Dirichlet Process Mixture On minimization of divergence measures Energy minimization justifications Variational learning with exponential family Mean parametrization and marginal polytopes Convex dualities The log-partition function and conjugate duality Belie...

متن کامل

Declutter Your Justifications: Determining Similarity Between OWL Explanations

Given the high expressivity of the Web Ontology Language OWL 2, there is a potential for great diversity in the logical content of OWL ontologies. The fact that many naturally occurring entailments of such ontologies have multiple justifications indicates that ontologies often overdetermine their consequences, suggesting a diversity in supporting reasons. On closer inspection, however, we often...

متن کامل

Human cloning laws, human dignity and the poverty of the policy making dialogue

BACKGROUND The regulation of human cloning continues to be a significant national and international policy issue. Despite years of intense academic and public debate, there is little clarity as to the philosophical foundations for many of the emerging policy choices. The notion of "human dignity" is commonly used to justify cloning laws. The basis for this justification is that reproductive hum...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007